Impact of inclusive language in the construction of equitable societies, a sociocultural approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59169/pentaciencias.v17i2.1462Keywords:
equity; inclusive; languageAbstract
Inclusive language has played a fundamental role in the transformation of societies towards more equitable models, by influencing the perception and representation of historically marginalized groups. From a sociocultural approach, it is evident that the way words were used not only reflected power structures, but also contributed to reinforcing or modifying them. Its implementation made it possible to make diverse identities and experiences visible, promoting more fair and respectful communication within different areas, such as education, work and the media. The use of inclusive language generated debates in different social spheres, as it challenged established linguistic norms and questioned traditional patterns of expression. For many communities, its adoption represented progress in the fight for equality, as it helped reduce exclusion and discrimination based on gender, sexual orientation or identity. However, it also faced resistance from sectors that argued that it modified the structure of the language and could make communication difficult. Its use promoted changes in the way institutions designed their messages, influencing inclusion policies and promoting greater sensitivity towards diversity. With this, values of respect and equity were strengthened, promoting the construction of more just and representative societies.
Downloads
References
Ashkanasy, N. (2005). Rumors of the death of emotional intelligence in organizational behavior are vastly exaggerated. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 441-452. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.320
Bar-On, R. (2006). The Bar-On Model of Emotional-Social Intelligence (ESI). Psicothema, 18(Suppl), 13-25.
Boyatzis, R. (2008). Competencies in the 21st century. Journal of Management Development, 27(1), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710810840730
Bradberry, T. (2009). Emotional Intelligence 2.0. TalentSmart.
Cherniss, C. (2001). The emotionally intelligent workplace: How to select for, measure, and improve emotional intelligence in individuals, groups, and organizations. Jossey-Bass.
George, J. M. (2000). Emotions and leadership: The role of emotional intelligence. Human Relations, 53(8), 1027-1055. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700538001
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ. Bantam Books.
Mayer, J. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In P. Salovey & D. Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional Development and Emotional Intelligence: Educational Implications (pp. 3-31). Basic Books.
Petrides, K. (2003). Trait emotional intelligence: Behavioural validation in two studies of emotion recognition and reactivity to mood induction. European Journal of Personality, 17(1), 39-57. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.466
Salovey, P. (2005). The science of emotional intelligence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(6), 281-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00381.x
Schutte, N. (2001). Emotional intelligence and interpersonal relations. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141(4), 523-536. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540109600569
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Científica Arbitrada Multidisciplinaria PENTACIENCIAS - ISSN 2806-5794.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.