Classrooms without borders: adaptive strategies to personalize learning in secondary education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59169/pentaciencias.v8i2.1817

Keywords:

personalized learning; adaptive strategies; secondary education; differentiated instruction; formative assessment; student autonomy

Abstract

Secondary education permanently faces the challenge of serving student populations with profoundly heterogeneous learning rhythms, styles, and needs. In this scenario, adaptive strategies emerge as a pedagogical response capable of personalizing instruction without sacrificing curricular coherence. This article aims to identify and systematize effective adaptive teaching strategies for secondary education that enable teachers to address student diversity, improve learning outcomes, and develop autonomy through personalized and flexible approaches. A mixed design was employed: a systematic literature review (2020-2025) complemented by the analysis of empirical data from three Ecuadorian secondary institutions. The systematic search across Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, SciELO, and Redalyc yielded 46 relevant studies after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results show that Universal Design for Learning (UDL), the flipped classroom, project-based learning, and continuous formative assessment are the strategies with the greatest empirical support, with effect sizes ranging from g = 0.43 to g = 0.64. The synergistic integration of these strategies, mediated by contextualized educational technologies and the strengthening of teacher and student metacognition, produces sustained improvements in academic performance and learner autonomy. It is concluded that effective personalization requires not only a diverse methodological repertoire but also institutional conditions, specific teacher training, and formative assessment frameworks that sustain pedagogical flexibility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Admiraal, W., Lockhorst, D., Post, L. y Kester, L. (2024). Effects of students' autonomy support on their self-regulated learning strategies: Three field experiments in secondary education. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 10(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.3343

Almeqdad, Q. I., Alodat, A. M., Alquraan, M. F., Hunaiti, M. A. y Al-Shara, I. (2023). The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2218191. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2218191

Añapa Tapuyo, W. J., Pucuna Sapa, L. R., Villalva Heredia, C. I. y Silva Adriano, L. E. (2025). Tecnologías emergentes en educación: Aprendizaje personalizado y automatizado. Revista Scientific, 10(35), 297-320. https://doi.org/10.29394/scientific.issn.2542-2987.2025.10.35.14.297-320

Ayala Hidalgo , S. A., Montesdeoca Quishpe, M. S., Mejía Tanguila, O. C., Alvarado Diaz, M. L., & Quinzo Guevara, J. I. (2025). Aula Invertida en Educación Secundaria: Una Revisión Sistemática sobre su Impacto en el Rendimiento Académico y la Autonomía del Estudiante. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 9(4), 3324-3345. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v9i4.18987

Bajaña Calle , O. A., Palacios Campos , J. S., Villaprado Bajaña , L. A., Alvarado Villamar , V. I., & Almendáriz Manzo, L. G. (2025). La metodología de aula invertida para mejorar el aprendizaje autónomo en Física y Matemática en estudiantes de Bachillerato del Ecuador. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 9(2), 5823-5834. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v9i2.17334

Banihashem, S. K., Gašević, D., Noroozi, O., Jarodzka, H., Joosten-ten Brinke, D. y Drachsler, H. (2025). Optimizing formative assessment with learning analytics. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543251370753

Bernacki, M. L., Greene, M. J. y Lobczowski, N. G. (2021). A systematic review of research on personalized learning: Personalized by whom, to what, how, and for what purpose(s)? Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1675-1715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09615-8

Boardman, A. G., Polman, J. L., Scornavacco, K. et al. (2024). Examining enactments of project-based learning in secondary English language arts. AERA Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584241269829

Brady, A. C., Wolters, C. A. et al. (2021). Fostering metacognition to support student learning and performance. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(4), fe3. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-12-0289

Bray, A., Devitt, A., Banks, J., Sanchez Fuentes, S., Sandoval, M., Riviou, K., Byrne, D., Flood, M., Reale, J., & Terrenzio, S. (2024). What next for Universal Design for Learning? A systematic literature review of technology in UDL implementations at second level. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55, 113–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13328

Castelo Barreno, L. F., Aguilar Quevedo, J. E., & Guale Tomalá, Y. J. (2024). La tecnología educativa y su influencia en la experiencia de aprendizaje y rendimiento escolar. aula virtual, 5(12), 688–701. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12791475

Diaz-Núñez, A. del P., & Arana-Medina, C. M. (2024). Impacto del Aprendizaje Basado en Proyectos en el Rendimiento Académico de Estudiantes Ecuatorianos en Instituciones de Básica Superior. MQRInvestigar, 8(2), 680–695. https://doi.org/10.56048/MQR20225.8.2.2024.680-695

Dumont, H. y Ready, D. D. (2023). On the promise of personalized learning for educational equity. npj Science of Learning, 8, 26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-023-00174-x

Fernández-Morante, C., Cebreiro-López, B., Rodríguez-Malmierca, M.-J., & Casal-Otero, L. (2022). Adaptive Learning Supported by Learning Analytics for Student Teachers’ Personalized Training during in-School Practices. Sustainability, 14(1), 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010124

García-Ros, R., Pérez-González, F., Tomás, J.M. et al. Effects of self-regulated learning and procrastination on academic stress, subjective well-being, and academic achievement in secondary education. Curr Psychol 42, 26602–26616 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03759-8

Griful-Freixenet, J., Struyven, K., Vantieghem, W. y Gheyssens, E. (2020). Exploring the interrelationship between Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and Differentiated Instruction (DI): A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 29, 100306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100306

Gunawardena, M., Bishop, P. y Aviruppola, K. (2024). Personalized learning: The simple, the complicated, the complex and the chaotic. Teaching and Teacher Education, 143, 104346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104429

Herrera Barzallo, J. G., Arias Villalba, W. O., Estrella Romero, V. A., & Obando Santillán, D. I. (2024). Aprendizaje autónomo y metacognición en el bachillerato: desarrollo de habilidades para el siglo XXI, una revisión desde la literatura. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10659690

Karan, B. y Angadi, G. R. (2023). Potential risks of artificial intelligence integration into school education: A systematic review. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/02704676231224705

King-Sears, M. E., Stefanidis, A., Evmenova, A. S. et al. (2023). Achievement of learners receiving UDL instruction: A meta-analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 122, 103956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103956

Létourneau, A., Deslandes Martineau, M., Charland, P., Karran, J. A., Boasen, J. y Léger, P. M. (2025). A systematic review of AI-driven intelligent tutoring systems (ITS) in K-12 education. npj Science of Learning, 10, 29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00320-7

Li, S., Fu, W., Liu, X. y Hwang, G.-J. (2025). Effectiveness of flipped classrooms for K-12 students: Evidence from a three-level meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 95(5), 929-971. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543241261732

Lindner, K.-T. y Schwab, S. (2020). Differentiation and individualisation in inclusive education: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 29(12). https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1813450

Manobanda Calberto, L. I., Vásquez Guerrero, R. M., García Castro, N. G., & Rumiguano Carrera, D. M. (2022). Aprendizaje Basado en Proyectos como estrategia en la planificación microcurricular de docentes del bachillerato técnico. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 6(5), 169-187. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v6i5.3067

Montesdeoca Quishpe , M. S., Mosquera Hidalgo, P. M., Mejía Tanguila, O. C., Alvarado Diaz, M. L., & Quinzo Guevara, J. I. (2025). Aplicación del diseño universal para el aprendizaje (DUA) en contextos rurales con limitaciones tecnológicas: un análisis sistemático de la literatura. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 9(5), 112-136. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v9i5.19620

Morris, T. H., Koutsouris, G., Stentiford, L., & Bremner, N. (2025). Self-directed learning—a framework for inclusion ‘In’ and ‘Through’ Education – A systematic review. Review of Education, 13, e70028. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.70028

Muijs, D. (2020). Metacognition and self-regulation: Evidence review. Education Endowment Foundation. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED612286.pdf

Pan, A.-J., Lai, C.-F. y Kuo, H.-C. (2023). Investigating the impact of a possibility-thinking integrated project-based learning history course on high school students' creativity, learning motivation, and history knowledge. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, 101214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101214

Pozas, M., Letzel, V. and Schneider, C. (2020), Teachers and differentiated instruction: exploring differentiation practices to address student diversity. J Res Spec Educ Needs, 20: 217-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12481

Sibley, L., Fabian, A., Plicht, C. et al. (2025). Adaptive teaching with technology enhances lasting learning. Learning and Instruction, 99, 102141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102141

Sibley, L., Lachner, A., Plicht, C. et al. (2024). Feasibility of adaptive teaching with technology: Which implementation conditions matter? Computers & Education, 219, 105108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105108

Smets, W., De Neve, D., & Struyven, K. (2022). Responding to students’ learning needs: how secondary education teachers learn to implement differentiated instruction. Educational Action Research, 30(2), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2020.1848604

Stanja, J., Gritz, W., Krugel, J., Hoppe, A., & Dannemann, S. (2023). Formative assessment strategies for students' conceptions—The potential of learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54, 58–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13288

Strelan, P., Osborn, A. y Palmer, E. (2020). The flipped classroom: A meta-analysis of effects on student performance across disciplines and education levels. Educational Research Review, 30, 100314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100314

Topali, P., Haelermans, C., Molenaar, I. & Segers, E. (2025). Pedagogical considerations in the automation era: A systematic literature review of AIEd in K-12 authentic settings. British Educational Research Journal, 51, 2777–2809. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4200

Van Schoors, R., Elen, J., Raes, A., & Depaepe, F. (2021). An overview of 25 years of research on digital personalised learning in primary and secondary education: A systematic review of conceptual and methodological trends. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52, 1798–1822. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13148

Veugen, M. J., Gulikers, J. T. M. y den Brok, P. (2024). Secondary school teachers' use of formative assessment practice to create co-regulated learning. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 8, 15-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-024-00089-9

Voskamp, A., Kuiper, E., & Volman, M. (2022). Teaching practices for self-directed and self-regulated learning: case studies in Dutch innovative secondary schools. Educational Studies, 48(6), 772–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1814699

Wagner, M., Gegenfurtner, A. y Urhahne, D. (2021). Effectiveness of the flipped classroom on student achievement in secondary education: A meta-analysis. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 35(1), 11-31. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000274

Wijnia, L., Noordzij, G., Arends, L.R. et al. The Effects of Problem-Based, Project-Based, and Case-Based Learning on Students’ Motivation: a Meta-Analysis. Educ Psychol Rev 36, 29 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09864-3

Winandar, I. Z., & Rifandi, A. (2025). Learning Management System in Optimizing Distance and Independent Learning in Open High School. Journal of Innovation and Research in Primary Education, 4(4), 2314–2323. https://doi.org/10.56916/jirpe.v4i4.2082

Xuan, Q., Cheung, A. C. K. y Sun, D. (2022). The effectiveness of formative assessment for enhancing reading achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 990196. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.990196

Zhang, L. y Ma, Y. (2023). A study of the impact of project-based learning on student learning effects: A meta-analysis study. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1202728. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1202728

Zheng, L., Bhagat, K. K., Zhen, Y., & Zhang, X. (2020). The Effectiveness of the Flipped Classroom on Students’ Learning Achievement and Learning Motivation: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23(1), 1–15. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26915403

Ziernwald, L., Hillmayr, D. y Holzberger, D. (2022). Promoting high-achieving students through differentiated instruction in mixed-ability classrooms—A systematic review. Journal of Advanced Academics, 33(4), 540-573. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X221112931

Published

2026-05-26

How to Cite

Quito Cando, R. V. ., Padilla Morales , V. C. ., Acosta Loor , D. Y. ., & Fuentes Samaniego, C. M. . (2026). Classrooms without borders: adaptive strategies to personalize learning in secondary education. Revista Científica Arbitrada Multidisciplinaria PENTACIENCIAS - ISSN 2806-5794., 8(2), 490–502. https://doi.org/10.59169/pentaciencias.v8i2.1817

Issue

Section

Artículos de revisión